قديم خانقاہی نظام اورسلاسل اربعہ کے بنیادی مشترکات:ایک مطالعہ

A Study of Ancient Monastic System and the Main Features of Four Sufi Orders

Authors

  • Fozia Naeem Assistant Professor of Islamic Studies Government Graduate college Jarranwala, Faisalabad
  • Ayesha Naeem Doctoral Candidate, Department of Philosophy, University of the Punjab, Lahore

Keywords:

Monastic System, Islam, Main Features, Four Sufi Orders

Abstract

During the Umayyad and Abbasid reigns the mystics tried their best to propagate the teachings of Islam by keeping a distance from the power corridors. They resolved to perform the duty of preaching Islam in a solid and practical way by remaining aloof from the tyrannous governmental powers. Different convoys of the mystics reached every nook and corner of the world in different ages, and with their sincere and compromising policy impressed the veracity of Islam upon the minds of the astray people. And in this way, by enlightening them with the light of Islam, made them a strong link of a wide circle in which the standard of respect and regard is not caste, colour or racial superiority but character and piety. This is the basis of old monastic system. The monastery of Sayed Ali bin Usman Hujveri alias Data Ganj Bakhsh (died 665AH) is considered to be the oldest in the subcontinent (established 431AH). The light of Islam spread in the mountains and valleys of Central Asia through the untiring efforts of the ancient revered saints. The monasteries of the saints acted as the centers of knowledge and enlightenment for many centuries. The fame of the cities like Khiva, Samarkand, Bukhara and Neyshabur spread far and wide. The old monastic system contributed to the propagation of Islam and it created many Orders (Silasil) the fundamental objective of which was to make the following of the teachings of Islam obligatory. Though these orders have differences over the spiritual paths (suluks) they adopt, the root of all the Orders is to ‘enjoin good and forbid evil’. The origin and evolution of these Orders in the subcontinent started in the 13th century. Their number increased rapidly in the beginning, but most of them underwent extinction for different reasons except the four ones. The reason of survival of the Four Orders is the common features of several of their principles.

References

R ‘Ālī Ibn ‘Uthmān Ḥajwairī, Kashaf al-Maḥjūb(Lahore: Islāmī Kutub Khānah), 61.

Muhammad Ibn Muhammad al-Ghazālī, Aḥyā’ al-Ulūm(Beirūt: Dār al-M‘arifah), 2: 250.

Prof. Ḍayā al-Ḥasan, Taṣuwaf(Lahore: Taṣawuf Foudation, 1999 AD), 95.

Jalāl al-Dīn Abdul Raḥmān al-Sayuṭī, Tārīkh al-Khulfā (Lahore: Zavyah Publishers, 2014AD), 158.

Ḍayā al-Ḥasan, Ayinah Taṣawuf, 98.

Prof. Laṭīf Ullah, Ṭaṣawuf aur Sīrat (Lahore: Idārah Thaqāfat Islāmiyah), 215.

Mīr Khurad Kirmānī, Muhammad Ibn Mubārak ‘Alvī (Lahore: Markaz Taḥqīqāt Fārsī, 1957AD), 57.

Sarwar Lāhurī Makhdūm, Muftī Ḥadīqa al-Auliyā (Lahore: Al-M‘ārif, 2000AD), 30.

Shaikh Abdul Ḥaq Dahlvī, Siyar al-Auliyā Akhbār al-Akhyār(Lahore: Shabīr Publishers), 47.

Prof. Khudā Bakhash, Islāmī Akhlāq-o-Taṣawuf(Lahore: Evernew book Publish, 1998AD), 471.

Syed ‘Ālāu al-Dīn, Tazkrah Qādriyah(Quethe: Darbār Ghosiyah, 1998AD), 99.

Abdul Qādir Jīlānī, Ghuniya al-Tālbīn (Lahore: Jāwaid and Company, 1998AD), 43.

Abdul Qādar Jīlānī, Ghaoth A‘ẓam, Al-Fatah al-Rubānī (Beirūt: Dār al-M‘arifah), 295.

Dr. Muhammad Ḥafīẓ al-Rāḥmān, Taṣawuf aur Ṣufiyah Kī Tārīkh ‘Ārab Sy Ḥindustān Tak (Lahore: Shākar Publi Cashans, 2014AD), 50.

Urdu Dairah M‘āraf Islāmiyah (Lahore: Punjab University, 1964AD), 4: 426.

Abdul Raḥmān Chisthī, Shaikh Mirāt al-Asrār(Lahore: Bazam Ithāt al-Muslmīn, 1412AH), 539.

Syed Ṣabāḥ al-Dīn, Bazam Ṣufiyah (Lahore: ‘Ilam-o-Irfān Publishers, 2016AD), 130.

Syed Muhammad Qāsim, Islāmī Encyclopedia (Lahore: Al-Faisal Nāshrān-o-Tājirān Kutub), 6: 205.

Aḥmad Muṣtfah Ṣadīqī, Ḥamāry Walī(Lahore: Jahāngīr Book Dipo), 16.

Prof. Laṭīf Allah, Taṣawuf aur Sīrat, 432.

Shahāb al-Dīn Saharwardī, ‘Āawārf al-M‘āraf, 191.

Shaikh Muhammad Ikrām, Āb-e-Kauthar(Lahore: Idārah Thaqāfat Islāmiyah, 2002AD), 252.

Ḥafīz al-Raḥmān, Taṣawuf aur Ṣufiyah Kī Tārīkh ‘Ārab Sy Ḥindustān Tak, 50.

Shaikh Muhammad Ibn Sulaimān Baghdādī, Tuḥfah Naqashbandiya(Lahore: Dār-al Ikhlāṣ, 2010AD), 36.

Fārūqī, Āynah Taṣawuf, 95.

Nūr Bakhash Tawaklī, Tazkrah Mashāikh Naqashband(Lahore: Mushtāq book Corner), 135.

Shāh Ḥamīd Ullah Hāshmī, Aḥwāl-o-Āthār Ḥaẓrat Bahāo al-Dīn Zakriyā Multānī (Lahore: Taṣawuf Foundation, 2000AD), 62.

Baghdādī, Tuḥfah Naqashbandiya, 36.

Abdul Qādar Saharwardī, Ādāb al-Murīdīn(Lahore: Taṣawuf Foundation, 1998AD), 11.

Al-Shamas 91: 9,10.

Al-A‘lā 87: 14.

Al-Juma‘ 62: 2.

Fārūqī, Āynah Taṣawuf, 120.

Mirzā Muhammad Akhtar Dahlvī, Auliyā Barsghīr Pak-o-Hind, 67.

Al-Furqān 25: 43.

Ibn-e-Hajar ‘Asqlānī, Tahzīb al-Tahzīb, 11: 490.

Al-An‘ām 6: 79.

Al-Shamas 91: 7-10.

Al-Muṭafifīn 83: 14.

Al-Syuṭī, Al-Jāmi‘ al-Ṣaghīr, Ḥadīth: 2064.

Al-A‘rāf 7: 175, 176.

Al-Nisā 4: 59.

Al-Nisā 4: 80.

Al-Nisa 4: 64.

Al-Baqara 2: 165.

Al-Muzamil 73: 8.

Ibn-e-Mājah, Al-Sunan (Beirūt: Dār al-Fikar, 2003), Ḥadīth: 7334.

Al-Fatah 48: 29.

Al-Taoba 9: 72.

Al-A‘rāf 7: 179.

Al-Ẓāriyāt 51: 56.

Al-Ḥajar15: 99.

Jīlānī, Ghunyat al-Tālbīn, 93.

Al-‘Ankabūt 29: 69.

Al-A‘rāf 7: 204.

Molvī Ferūz al-Dīn, Ferūz al-Lughāt (Lahore: Ferūz Sons), 807.

Abū Dānyāl Naqāsh, Allah K Walī Kon (Karachi: Maktba Arslān, 2004AD), 107.

Ṭāha 20: 53.

Al-‘Ankabūt 29: 69.

Al-Nūr 24: 31.

Dr. Abdul Raḥmān Miṣrī, Maqāmāt Salūk (Lahore: Zavya Traders), 67.

Al-Nisā 4: 77.

Shāh Abdul Qādar ‘Īsā, Ḥaqāiq ‘an al-Taṣawuf(Lahore: Zavya Foudation 2011AD), 26.

Al-Māidah 5: 23.

Dr. Abdul Rashīd, Taṣawuf Aulyā-e- Mānkī aur Taḥrīk Pakistan (Karachi: Aulyā Accadmey, 1991AD) 57.

Al-‘Imrān 3: 92.

Al-Kahaf 18: 16.

Al-Aḥzāb 33: 41.

Shaikh Aḥmad Sarhandī, Maktūbāt Um-e-Rabānī (Lahore: Progressive books, 2006AD), 77.

Al-Baqrah 2: 142.

Al-Baqrah 2: 153.

Al-Aḥzāb 33: 52.

Abdul Raḥmān Al-Qushairī, Risālah Qushairiya (Lahore: Maktbah A‘lā Ḥazrat Darbār Market, 1430AH), 387.

Al-Baynah 98: 8.

Al-Baqrah 2: 186.

Published

2022-06-30

How to Cite

Fozia Naeem, and Ayesha Naeem. 2022. “قديم خانقاہی نظام اورسلاسل اربعہ کے بنیادی مشترکات:ایک مطالعہ: A Study of Ancient Monastic System and the Main Features of Four Sufi Orders”. Al-Qamar 5 (2):185-200. https://alqamarjournal.com/index.php/alqamar/article/view/1003.