حد سرقہ سے متعلق فقہی مباحث اور ان کے معاصر اطلاقات : "المحلیٰ" اور "الہدایہ " کے تناظر میں ایک مطالعہJurisprudential Discourses on the Punishment of Theft and their Contemporary Applications: A Study in Context of “al-Muḥallā” and “al-Hidāyah”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53762/d3c39w15Keywords:
Theft, jurists, al-Muḥallā, al-Hidāyah, contemporary applicationsAbstract
This paper studies jurisprudential discourses on the punishment of theft and their contemporary applications in context of “Kitāb al-Sariqah” from “al-Muḥallā”, a manual of Zahirite or literalist school of Islamic Jurisprudence by Ibn Ḥazm (994-1064), and “al-Hidāyah”, a manual of Ḥanafī Jurisprudence by al-Marghīnānī (1117-1197). It finds that in a total of eighty-two issues, the two jurists have six commonalities and thirteen differences while Ibn Ḥazm has eight and al-Marghīnānī has thirty-seven unique points. Al-Marghīnānī has more comprehensiveness and diversity in the accounts of the relevant issues. Both jurists’ insights regarding the punishment of theft can be taken as a guide in various matters related to the crime of theft in modern times.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Abdul Ghaffar, Dr. Abdul Ghaffar (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.



