"قضايا فقهية تتعلق بالزكاة وتطبيقها في العصر الحديث: دراسةمقارنۃ بین " المحلي "و "الھداية

Jurisprudential issues related to Zakāh and their application in Modern times: A comparative study of “al-Muḥallā” and “al-Hidāyah”

Authors

  • Hafiz Abdus Salam PhD Scholar Islamic Studies, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur/ Lecturer, Govt. Graduate College Bahawalpur Author
  • Dr. Abdul Ghaffar Assistant Professor of Islamic studies, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur Author https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7132-0093 (unauthenticated)
  • Muhammad Waris M.Phil Scholar Islamic Studies, Qurtuba University of science & Information Technology, Dera Ismail Khan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53762/9bbcqg34

Keywords:

“Kitāb al-Zakāh”, issues, Al-Muḥallā”, “al-Hidāyah”

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative study of the issues related to “Kitāb al-Zakāh” from “al-Muḥallā”, a manual of Zahirite or literalist school of Islamic Jurisprudence by Ibn Ḥazm (994-1064), and “al-Hidāyah”, a manual of Ḥanafī Jurisprudence by al-Marghīnānī (1117-1197). It finds that differences between Zahirites and Ḥanafīs in referred perspectives are of different kinds. Some of them are fundamental and some are having the nature of better or good. In some issues Zahirites’ opinions are more accommodating in terms of modern requirements and in some issues Ḥanafīs have presented more logical and convenient ideas in terms of the needs of the hour

 

Downloads

Published

2018-12-31

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 02 (2018): (July -December 2018)

Section

Research Papers

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Hafiz Abdus Salam, Dr. Abdul Ghaffar, Muhammad Waris (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

"قضايا فقهية تتعلق بالزكاة وتطبيقها في العصر الحديث: دراسةمقارنۃ بین " المحلي "و "الھداية: Jurisprudential issues related to Zakāh and their application in Modern times: A comparative study of “al-Muḥallā” and “al-Hidāyah”. (2018). Al-Qamar, 1(02), 57-68. https://doi.org/10.53762/9bbcqg34