Kant’s Metaphysical Framework: A Critical Study in the Context of the Islamic Conception of Knowledge and Ethics

کانٹ کا مابعدالطبیعیاتی فریم ورک: اسلامی تصورِ علم و اخلاق کے تناظر میں تنقیدی مطالعہ

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53762/alqamar.09.03.05

Keywords:

Immanuel Kant; Metaphysical Framework; Transcendental Idealism; Epis-temology; Philosophy of Religion; Moral Philosophy

Abstract

This study presents a critical analysis of Immanuel Kant’s metaphysical framework, with particular reference to his theory of knowledge, conception of reason, philosophy of religion, and moral philosophy. It examines the relationship between Kant’s epistemology and his understanding of religion, particularly his distinction between theoretical and practical reason and his restriction of the scope of human reason in metaphysical matters. The study argues that Kant’s separation of faith and reason is closely connected with the intellectual context of rationalist metaphysics and Christian theology. In contrast, the Islamic intellectual tradition approaches knowledge through an integrated relationship among reason, revelation, and human nature (fiṭrah). The study further examines Kant’s moral philosophy, particularly his conception of pure practical reason, the categorical imperative, duty, freedom, and moral responsibility. It argues that morality cannot be adequately grounded in abstract rational principles alone, since moral consciousness, the distinction between good and evil, and the capacity for moral responsibility are rooted in the human self (nafs) and its innate disposition. Drawing upon Qur’anic teachings and Islamic intellectual thought, the study proposes that revelation does not negate innate human knowledge but completes and reinforces the moral and intellectual awareness embedded in human nature. The study concludes that the Islamic conception of knowledge and ethics provides an integrated framework in which reason, revelation, fiṭrah, and the human self operate in a mutually complementary relationship, offering an alternative perspective to Kant’s restricted conception of reason, morality, and metaphysical knowledge.

References

Immanuel Kant, Tanqīd-i ʿAql-i Maḥz, trans. Sayyid ʿĀbid Ḥusayn (Dihlī: Anjuman Taraqqī-yi Urdū [Hind], 1941), 98.

Immanuel Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, translated and edited by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), Bxxx.

Kant, Critique of pure reason,(A51/B75)

Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi, The Main Philosophical Writings and the Novel Allwill, translated by George di Giovanni (Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1994), 335–38..

Sayyid Naẓīr Niyāzī, Tashkīl-i Jadīd Ilāhiyāt-i Islāmiyah (Lāhaur: Bazm-i Iqbāl, 2021), 37–65.

Muṣṭafā Ṣabrī, Mawqif al-ʿAql wa-al-ʿIlm wa-al-ʿĀlam min Rabb al-ʿĀlamīn wa-ʿIbādihi al-Mursalīn, vol. 2 (Bayrūt: Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī, 1981/1401 AH), 149–50.

ʿAbd al-Ḥamīd Farāhī, Ḥujaj al-Qurʾān: al-Ḥikmah al-Bāziʿah wa-al-Ḥujjah al-Bālighah (Aʿẓamgarh, U.P.: Dāʾirah Ḥamīdiyyah, 2009/1430 AH), 93–94.

Chris L. Firestone, Nathan A. Jacobs, and James H. Joiner, eds., Kant and the Question of Theology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017), “The Limits of Speculative Cognition,” 14–17.

Firestone, Jacobs, and Joiner, Kant and the Question of Theology, 28–29..

Immanuel Kant, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. 1785, Ak. 4:421.

Kant, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, Ak. 4:397–400,

Arthur Schopenhauer, The Basis of Morality, translated by Arthur Broderick Bullock (London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co., Limited, Paternoster Square, 1903), 29.

Schopenhauer, The Basis of Morality, 30.

Schopenhauer, The Basis of Morality, 32.

Schopenhauer, The Basis of Morality, 34.

Kant, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, Ak. 4:393

Firestone, Jacobs, and Joiner, Kant and the Question of Theology, 60-61.

Firestone, Jacobs, and Joiner, Kant and the Question of Theology, 61.

Firestone, Jacobs, and Joiner, Kant and the Question of Theology, 61.

Schopenhauer, The basis of morality, 49.

Schopenhauer, The basis of morality, 119,241.

al-Bukhārī, Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī, raqm 52.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

Kant’s Metaphysical Framework: A Critical Study in the Context of the Islamic Conception of Knowledge and Ethics: کانٹ کا مابعدالطبیعیاتی فریم ورک: اسلامی تصورِ علم و اخلاق کے تناظر میں تنقیدی مطالعہ. (2026). Al-Qamar, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.53762/alqamar.09.03.05