Religious Seminaries and Social Welfare in Pakistan: Strategic Management of Informal Social Protection Provision
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53762/alqamar.09.03.01Keywords:
Strategic Management; Resource Mobilization; Resource Dependence; Nonprofit Management; Informal Social Protection; Faith-Based Organizations; Madāris; Pakistan.Abstract
Religious seminaries (madāris) in Pakistan are often criticized for being too disconnected from social welfare and development. This paper reframes that debate in management terms. As madāris are informal social protection providers for the poor (providing free education, boarding, food and basic care), this is as much an organizational and strategic-management issue as it is a social-welfare one. In light of a secondary study methodology that draws on peer-reviewed literature and national-level statistics for resource mobilization and resource dependency and nonprofit management studies, we examine how madāris manage and structure welfare delivery in a way that is not necessarily well-designed in practice, and there is no formal process or monitoring. It compares and contrasts this informally run model with the formal management of Pakistan’s social safety net programmes (Benazir Income Support Programme, Pakistan Bait-ul-Mal and statutory Zakāt system) with the following management characteristics restricting the sector: limited formal planning, ad hoc resource allocation, weak reporting and monitoring, and funding volatility. The paper proposes a management framework in terms of formalised planning, diverse resourcing, light-touch reporting and policy recognition through which the informal welfare capacity can be better organised and coordinated with the formal provision of welfare. No single institution is considered in the study, and the evidence is gathered from a variety of independent, published sources. It adds to nonprofit and strategic management scholarship of the informal welfare sector in Pakistan, which is a large but under-studied community.
References
International Crisis Group, Pakistan: Madrasas, Extremism and the Military, Asia Report 36 (Islamabad/Brussels: International Crisis Group, 2002); P. W. Singer, Pakistan’s Madrassahs: Ensuring a System of Education Not Jihad, Analysis Paper 14 (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 2001); C. Christine Fair, The Madrassah Challenge: Militancy and Religious Education in Pakistan (Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press, 2008); Jamal Malik, ed., Madrasas in South Asia: Teaching Terror? (London: Routledge, 2008); Rebecca Winthrop and Corinne Graff, Beyond Madrasas: Assessing the Links between Education and Militancy in Pakistan, Working Paper 2 (Washington, DC: Center for Universal Education at Brookings, 2010); Fatima Sajjad, “Reforming Madrasa Education in Pakistan: Post 9/11 Perspectives,” Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization 3, no. 1 (2013): 104–21, https://journals.umt.edu.pk/index.php/JITC/article/view/38.
Tahir Andrabi et al., “Religious School Enrollment in Pakistan: A Look at the Data,” Comparative Education Review 50, no. 3 (2006): 446–77, https://doi.org/10.1086/503885; A. Cockcroft et al., “Challenging the Myths about Madaris in Pakistan: A National Household Survey of Enrolment and Reasons for Choosing Religious Schools,” International Journal of Educational Development 29, no. 4 (2009): 342–49.
Zahid Mumtaz, “Madrassas as a Provider of Informal Social Protection in Pakistan,” in Informal Social Protection and Poverty (Singapore: Springer, 2022), 85–107, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6474-9_5.
On resource mobilization theory, see John D. McCarthy and Mayer N. Zald, “Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory,” American Journal of Sociology 82, no. 6 (1977): 1212–41, https://doi.org/10.1086/226464; on resource dependence, Jeffrey Pfeffer and Gerald R. Salancik, The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (New York: Harper & Row, 1978); on nonprofit management, Karen A. Froelich, “Diversification of Revenue Strategies: Evolving Resource Dependence in Nonprofit Organizations,” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 28, no. 3 (1999): 246–68, https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764099283002; Jay Weerawardena and Gillian Sullivan Mort, “Investigating Social Entrepreneurship: A Multidimensional Model,” Journal of World Business 41, no. 1 (2006): 21–35.
Andrabi et al., “Religious School Enrollment”; Cockcroft et al., “Challenging the Myths.”
Barbara Daly Metcalf, Islamic Revival in British India: Deoband, 1860–1900 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1982); Francis Robinson, The ʿUlama of Farangi Mahall and Islamic Culture in South Asia (London: C. Hurst, 2001); Ali Riaz, “Madrassah Education in Pre-colonial and Colonial South Asia,” Journal of Asian and African Studies 46, no. 1 (2011): 69–86, https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909610387758.
Mumtaz Ahmad, “Madrassa Education in Pakistan and Bangladesh,” in Religious Radicalism and Security in South Asia, ed. Satu P. Limaye, Robert G. Wirsing, and Mohan Malik (Honolulu: Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies, 2004), 101–15; Tariq Rahman, Denizens of Alien Worlds: A Study of Education, Inequality and Polarization in Pakistan (Karachi: Oxford University Press, 2004); Muhammad Qasim Zaman, The Ulama in Contemporary Islam: Custodians of Change (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002).
Andrabi et al., “Religious School Enrollment”; Masooda Bano, The Rational Believer: Choices and Decisions in the Madrasas of Pakistan (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2012).
Cockcroft et al., “Challenging the Myths.”
A. Al Hussain, “State, Qawmi Madrasas and Children in Bangladesh: From a Social Protection Perspective” (master’s research paper, International Institute of Social Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 2018), https://thesis.eur.nl/pub/46690.
Sa’dullah Assa’idi, “The Growth of Pesantren in Indonesia as the Islamic Venue and Social Class Status of Santri,” Eurasian Journal of Educational Research 93 (2021): 425–40, https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1300132.
Metcalf, Islamic Revival.
S. H. F. Bukhari, “The Role of Zakat and Waqf in Poverty Reduction: An Islamic Approach in the Context of Pakistan,” Al-Aijaz Research Journal of Islamic Studies & Humanities 9, no. 1 (2025): 157–66; Y. Aziz et al., “Zakat and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Assessing the Ripple Effect of Obligatory-Alms Spending on Education—Empirical Evidence from Pakistan,” Asian Social Work and Policy Review 19, no. 1 (2025): e70006, https://doi.org/10.1111/aswp.70006.
Z. Iqbal, “Integrating Zakat and Waqf Systems to Support Halal Entrepreneurship and Inclusive Growth in Pakistan,” Journal of Halal Ethics and Research 1, no. 2 (2025): 31–42, https://doi.org/10.58932/MULJ0013.
R. Riani and I. Indra, “Revisiting Poverty Alleviation in Muslim Economies: The Impact of Zakat and Islamic Human Development,” International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, advance online publication, 2026, https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-10-2025-0797.
A. Sami et al., “The Impact of Zakat on Poverty Alleviation in Pakistan: An Islamic Jurisprudence Perspective,” TPM – Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology 32, no. S6 (2025): 2474–81.
R. Calder and T. Tanhchareun, Informal Social Protection: Social Relations and Cash Transfers (Canberra: Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Commonwealth of Australia, 2014).
Armando Barrientos and David Hulme, “Social Protection for the Poor and Poorest in Developing Countries: Reflections on a Quiet Revolution,” Oxford Development Studies 37, no. 4 (2009): 439–56, https://doi.org/10.1080/13600810903305257.
Ian Gough and Geof Wood, Insecurity and Welfare Regimes in Asia, Africa and Latin America: Social Policy in Development Contexts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004); Stephen Devereux and Rachel Sabates-Wheeler, Transformative Social Protection, IDS Working Paper 232 (Brighton: Institute of Development Studies, 2004).
Mumtaz, “Madrassas as a Provider.”
Zahid Mumtaz, “Conceptualizing Informal Social Protection: A Framework to Compare Formal and Informal Social Protection,” in Informal Social Protection and Poverty (Singapore: Springer, 2022), 45–72, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6474-9_3.
Zahid Mumtaz, “Determining Multiple Welfare Regimes in Pakistan,” in Informal Social Protection and Poverty (Singapore: Springer, 2022), 201–23, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6474-9_8; Zahid Mumtaz and Mulyadi Sumarto, “Suffering and Harm in Insecurity Welfare Regimes: Conflict and the Nexus of Formal and Informal Welfare in Pakistan,” Critical Social Policy 45, no. 2 (2025): 324–47, https://doi.org/10.1177/02610183241262978.
K. M. Kufoalor and A. Salifu, “Enhancing Social Protection: Examining the Interaction between Formal Programs and Traditional Support Systems in the Volta Region of Ghana,” SN Social Sciences 5 (2025): article 77, https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-025-01115-8; Tomy Ncube and Una Murray, “Using Design Thinking and Community Development Principles to Optimise the Interaction between Informal and Formal Social Protection Systems,” Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy 40, no. 2 (2025): 182–202, https://doi.org/10.1017/ics.2025.13; Zahid Mumtaz, “Conceptualising the Relationship between Formal and Informal Social Protection,” Social Policy and Society 24, no. 3 (2025): 383–400, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746423000337.
McCarthy and Zald, “Resource Mobilization.”
Jay Barney, “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage,” Journal of Management 17, no. 1 (1991): 99–120, https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108.
Pfeffer and Salancik, External Control of Organizations.
Froelich, “Diversification of Revenue Strategies”; Weerawardena and Mort, “Investigating Social Entrepreneurship.”
MariaLaura Di Domenico, Helen Haugh, and Paul Tracey, “Social Bricolage: Theorizing Social Value Creation in Social Enterprises,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 34, no. 4 (2010): 681–703, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00370.x.
Gerard Clarke and Michael Jennings, eds., Development, Civil Society and Faith-Based Organizations: Bridging the Sacred and the Secular (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008), https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230371262.
Henry B. Hansmann, “The Role of Nonprofit Enterprise,” Yale Law Journal 89, no. 5 (1980): 835–901.
Lester M. Salamon and Helmut K. Anheier, “Social Origins of Civil Society: Explaining the Nonprofit Sector Cross-Nationally,” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 9, no. 3 (1998): 213–48.
John M. Bryson, Strategic Planning for Public and Nonprofit Organizations: A Guide to Strengthening and Sustaining Organizational Achievement, 5th ed. (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2018).
Henry Mintzberg and James A. Waters, “Of Strategies, Deliberate and Emergent,” Strategic Management Journal 6, no. 3 (1985): 257–72, https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250060306.
Barney, “Firm Resources.”
Mintzberg and Waters, “Of Strategies.”
Weerawardena and Mort, “Investigating Social Entrepreneurship.”
Salamon and Anheier, “Social Origins.”
Paolo Ricci et al., “Management Capabilities in Poverty Alleviation: A Bibliometric Review of Practices in Religious Organizations,” Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, advance online publication, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-06-2024-0603.
Government of Pakistan, The Zakat and Ushr Ordinance, 1980 (Islamabad: Ministry of Religious Affairs, 1980).
Oxford Policy Management, Benazir Income Support Programme: Final Impact Evaluation Report (Oxford: Oxford Policy Management, 2016).
Zahid Mumtaz and Peter Whiteford, “Comparing Formal and Informal Social Protection: A Case Study Exploring the Usefulness of Informal Social Protection in Pakistan,” Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy 37, no. 3 (2021): 243–72, https://doi.org/10.1017/ics.2021.9.
Mumtaz, “Conceptualising the Relationship”; Zahid Mumtaz and Stefan Kühner, “Towards a Theorization of the Global Community Welfare Regime: Depicting Four Ideal Types of the Community’s Role in Welfare Provision,” Journal of European Social Policy 35, no. 2 (2025): 189–209, https://doi.org/10.1177/09589287241311157; Ncube and Murray, “Using Design Thinking.”
Zahid Mumtaz and Keetie Roelen, “Winners and Losers: Class Dynamics and Social Protection in Pakistan,” International Journal of Social Welfare 34, no. 2 (2025): e12700, https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12700.
Aziz et al., “Zakat and Sustainable Development Goals”; Bukhari, “Role of Zakat and Waqf”; Ricci et al., “Management Capabilities”; A. Sattar, “Innovations in Madrassa Management: Case Study in Pakistan,” Jahan-e-Tahqeeq 7, no. 1 (2024): 1330–43.
Mumtaz and Roelen, “Winners and Losers.”
Mumtaz, “Conceptualising the Relationship.”
Mumtaz and Kühner, “Towards a Theorization.”
Zahid Mumtaz, Antonios Roumpakis, and Mulyadi Sumarto, “Overcoming Hybridisation in Global Welfare Regime Classifications: Lessons from a Single Case Study,” Journal of Social Policy 54 (2025): 1113–33, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279423000612.
Ncube and Murray, “Using Design Thinking.”
Kufoalor and Salifu, “Enhancing Social Protection.”
Ricci et al., “Management Capabilities.”
Sattar, “Innovations in Madrassa Management.”
S. R. H. Bukhari, E. Khan, and M. M. Haider, “Education and Power in Pakistan: Comparative Analysis of Public, Private, and Madrasa Systems and Their Role in Shaping Political Awareness and Democratic Governance,” Qlantic Journal of Social Sciences 6, no. 2 (2025): 420–32, https://doi.org/10.55737/qjss.vi-ii.25334.
A. Imtiaz, M. A. Dahar, and M. Ali, “Challenges and Opportunities in Integrating Peace Education into Madrasa Curricula in Pakistan,” Journal of Social Signs Review 3, no. 7 (2025): 256–74.
Bukhari, “Role of Zakat and Waqf.”
Aziz et al., “Zakat and Sustainable Development Goals.”
Mumtaz, “Madrassas as a Provider”; Mumtaz, “Conceptualising the Relationship.”
McCarthy and Zald, “Resource Mobilization”; Pfeffer and Salancik, External Control of Organizations; Mumtaz, “Conceptualizing Informal Social Protection.”
Mumtaz and Whiteford, “Comparing Formal and Informal.”
Mumtaz, “Conceptualising the Relationship.”
On resource mobilization, see McCarthy and Zald, “Resource Mobilization”; on resource dependence, Pfeffer and Salancik, External Control of Organizations; on nonprofit sustainability and revenue diversification, Froelich, “Diversification of Revenue Strategies”; and on social bricolage, Di Domenico, Haugh, and Tracey, “Social Bricolage.”
Pakistan Institute of Education, Pakistan Education Statistics 2021–22 (Islamabad: Ministry of Federal Education and Professional Training, 2023).
Academy of Educational Planning and Management, Pakistan Education Statistics 2016–17 (Islamabad: Ministry of Federal Education and Professional Training, 2018).
Masooda Bano, Female Islamic Education Movements: The Re-democratisation of Islamic Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).
Academy of Educational Planning and Management, Pakistan Education Statistics 2016–17.
Pakistan Institute of Education, Pakistan Education Statistics 2021–22.
Cockcroft et al., “Challenging the Myths.”
Andrabi et al., “Religious School Enrollment.”
Education Policy and Data Center, “Spotlight on Pakistan,” FHI 360, n.d., https://www.epdc.org/node/5911.html.
Al Hussain, “State, Qawmi Madrasas,” fig. 4.2.
Education Policy and Data Center, “Spotlight on Pakistan.”
Cockcroft et al., “Challenging the Myths”; Andrabi et al., “Religious School Enrollment.”
Pakistan Centre for Philanthropy, The State of Individual Philanthropy in Pakistan (Islamabad: Pakistan Centre for Philanthropy, 2016).
McCarthy and Zald, “Resource Mobilization.”
Pakistan Centre for Philanthropy, State of Individual Philanthropy.
Ibid.
Al Hussain, “State, Qawmi Madrasas,” fig. 4.1.
Pfeffer and Salancik, External Control of Organizations.
Froelich, “Diversification of Revenue Strategies.”
Di Domenico, Haugh, and Tracey, “Social Bricolage.”
Clarke and Jennings, Development, Civil Society; Hansmann, “Role of Nonprofit Enterprise.”
World Bank, Pakistan Poverty and Equity Brief (Washington, DC: World Bank Group, 2025).
Froelich, “Diversification of Revenue Strategies”; Weerawardena and Mort, “Investigating Social Entrepreneurship.”
Oxford Policy Management, Benazir Income Support Programme.
On resource mobilization, see McCarthy and Zald, “Resource Mobilization”; on resource dependence, Pfeffer and Salancik, External Control of Organizations; on nonprofit sustainability and revenue diversification, Froelich, “Diversification of Revenue Strategies”; and on social bricolage, Di Domenico, Haugh, and Tracey, “Social Bricolage.”
Bryson, Strategic Planning.
Froelich, “Diversification of Revenue Strategies”; Pfeffer and Salancik, External Control of Organizations.
Government of Pakistan, Zakat and Ushr Ordinance.
Zahid Mumtaz, Oko Chima Enworo, and Zitha Mokomane, “A Case for the Inclusion of Informal Social Protection in Social Policy Theory and Practice—Lessons from Nigeria and Pakistan,” Journal of Asian and African Studies 60, no. 7 (2025): 4219–33, https://doi.org/10.1177/00219096241249975.
Bryson, Strategic Planning.
Froelich, “Diversification of Revenue Strategies”; Pfeffer and Salancik, External Control of Organizations.
Government of Pakistan, Zakat and Ushr Ordinance.
On resource mobilization, see McCarthy and Zald, “Resource Mobilization”; on resource dependence, Pfeffer and Salancik, External Control of Organizations; on nonprofit sustainability, Froelich, “Diversification of Revenue Strategies”; and on strategic management, Bryson, Strategic Planning.
Clarke and Jennings, Development, Civil Society.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Sohail Nazar, Dr. Hafiz Ahmed Saeed Rana (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
